Ryan v. Cook Bldg. & Inv. Co.

1925 OK 610, 239 P. 180, 113 Okla. 78, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 884
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 14, 1925·No. 16194·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

LESTER, J.

The sole question at issue in this cause is whether a city organized under a charter form of government, as is Oklahoma City, should be required to furnish a financial statement and estimated needs to the excise board of the county, for the purpose of making the tax levy. This identical question was settled in the case of M. S. Ryan, County Treasurer, v. Roach Drug Company, 113 Okla. 129, 239 Pac. 912, in which the court held that it was mandatory upon the city, though operating under a city charter, to submit its budget for review to the excise board of the county, and that a levy made upon an estimate submitted by or through another source is invalid. Judgment affirmed.

NICHOLSON, O. X, '¡and 'HARRISON, MASON, PHELPS, HUNT, CLARK, and RILEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan v. Cook Bldg. & Inv. Co., 1925 OK 610, 239 P. 180, 113 Okla. 78, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 884 (Okla. 1925).

1925 OK 610 (Ryan v. Cook Bldg. & Inv. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leonard v. City of Wagoner
1936 OK 781 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1936)
Bank of Picher v. Morris
1932 OK 334 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
In Re Gypsy Oil Co.
1929 OK 536 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Grubb v. Smiley
1929 OK 534 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Pitts, Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Muskogee
1928 OK 668 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)