Ryan v. Collins

37 F.3d 1503, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35952, 1994 WL 555404
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 12, 1994
Docket94-2137
StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1503 (Ryan v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ryan v. Collins, 37 F.3d 1503, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35952, 1994 WL 555404 (8th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

37 F.3d 1503
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Craig M. RYAN, Appellant,
v.
Bruce COLLINS, Warden, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas
Department of Correction; Robert Perry, Major, Maximum
Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction; A. A.
Kamara, Classification Officer, Maximum Security Unit,
Arkansas Department of Correction; Harry Rhodes, Major,
Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction;
T. Green, Mental Health Counselor, Maximum Security Unit,
Arkansas Department of Correction; T. Pitts, Assistant
Warden, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of
Correction; Bill McLean, Grievance/Classification Officer,
Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction;
John Doe, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of
Correction; D. C. Heflin, Major, Maximum Security Unit,
Arkansas Department of Correction; Lt. R. Shelton; J.
Apel, Captain, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of
Correction, Appellees.

No. 94-2137.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: September 26, 1994.
Filed: October 12, 1994.

Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Craig M. Ryan, an Arkansas inmate, appeals the district court's1 grant of summary judgment for defendants. Ryan alleged that Arkansas correction officials denied him due process of law in assigning him to administrative segregation and failed to give him "meaningful" periodic reviews. We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs and conclude summary judgment was proper as no error of law appears. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 F.3d 1503, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35952, 1994 WL 555404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-collins-ca8-1994.