Ryan v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Ryan v. City of New York

160 N.E.2d 924, 6 N.Y.2d 896

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 8, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 160 N.E.2d 924 (Ryan v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryan v. City of New York, 160 N.E.2d 924, 6 N.Y.2d 896 (N.Y. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Van Voorhis. Chief Judge Conway dissents and votes to reverse and to order a new trial upon the ground that plaintiff clearly established a prima facie case and the jury found the facts in her favor (Kye v. Murray, 293 N. Y. 897). It was, therefore, not within the competency of the Appellate Division under our Constitution to find the facts to the contrary and to dismiss the complaint. Taking no part: Judge Burke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Van Voorhis. Chief Judge Conway dissents and votes to reverse and to order a new trial upon the ground that plaintiff clearly established a prima facie case and the jury found the facts in her favor (Kye v. Murray, 293 N. Y. 897). It was, therefore, not within the competency of the Appellate Division under our Constitution to find the facts to the contrary and to dismiss the complaint. Taking no part: Judge Burke.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 N.E.2d 924, 6 N.Y.2d 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack