Ryan v. City of Buffalo

167 A.D.2d 933, 563 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14509

This text of 167 A.D.2d 933 (Ryan v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ryan v. City of Buffalo, 167 A.D.2d 933, 563 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendants appeal from the denial of their motions for summary [934]*934judgment. A review of the record discloses that the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ proof should be determined at trial. Summary judgment should be denied if there is any doubt as to the existence of a triable issue, or if there is even arguably such an issue (see, Hourigan v McGarry, 106 AD2d 845). (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.— summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Law-ton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hourigan v. McGarry
106 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.D.2d 933, 563 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-city-of-buffalo-nyappdiv-1990.