Ryan v. Chanin
This text of 206 A.D.2d 957 (Ryan v. Chanin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment. There are questions of fact whether plaintiff remained under the continuous treatment or care of defendants within the 2 Vi years preceding the commencement of the action (see, CPLR 214-a; McDermott v Torre, 56 NY2d 399; DiFilippi v Huntington Hosp., 203 AD2d 321; Stilloe v Contini, 190 AD2d 419; Ward v Kaufman, 120 AD2d 929). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, Winick, J.—Renewal.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 A.D.2d 957, 616 N.Y.S.2d 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-chanin-nyappdiv-1994.