Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ryan v. Chanin

Ryan v. Chanin

206 A.D.2d 957, 616 N.Y.S.2d 283
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1994·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment. There are questions of fact whether plaintiff remained under the continuous treatment or care of defendants within the 2 Vi years preceding the commencement of the action (see, CPLR 214-a; McDermott v Torre, 56 NY2d 399; DiFilippi v Huntington Hosp., 203 AD2d 321; Stilloe v Contini, 190 AD2d 419; Ward v Kaufman, 120 AD2d 929). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, Winick, J.—Renewal.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan v. Chanin, 206 A.D.2d 957, 616 N.Y.S.2d 283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

206 A.D.2d 957 (Ryan v. Chanin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDermott v. Torre
437 N.E.2d 1108 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Ward v. Kaufman
120 A.D.2d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Stilloe v. Contini
190 A.D.2d 419 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
DiFilippi v. Huntington Hospital
203 A.D.2d 321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)