Ryan v. Blupal Realty Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ryan v. Blupal Realty Corp.

45 Misc. 2d 542, 257 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2322

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 45 Misc. 2d 542 (Ryan v. Blupal Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryan v. Blupal Realty Corp., 45 Misc. 2d 542, 257 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2322 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Contrary to the determination of the court below, nothing in subdivision (a) of section 401 of the CCA prevents a plaintiff in person from issuing a summons in an action or proceeding he is prosecuting in his own behalf. In contradistinction with its predecessors, subdivision (d) of section 29 of the New York City Civil Court Act, and section 19 of the Municipal Court Code, both of which employed the word “must”, the language of subdivision (a) of section 401 of the CCA is permissive rather than mandatory. In the absénce of an inconsistent statute, therefore, CPLR 321 (subd. [a]) and CPLR 105 (subd. [c]) must be deemed applicable to the court below (CPLR 101). A plaintiff in person, therefore, included in the definition of 1 ‘ attorney ’ ’ (CPLR 105, subd. [c]) must have the right to issue a summons in his own action (see O’Brien v. Lashar, 206 App. Div. 623, affd. 236 N. Y. 602; Dorter v. De Mesa, 196 App. Div. 462).

The orders should be reversed, with $10 costs and original motion of plaintiff granted.

Concur — Tilzer, J. P., Hoestadter and Hecht, JJ.

Orders reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Contrary to the determination of the court below, nothing in subdivision (a) of section 401 of the CCA prevents a plaintiff in person from issuing a summons in an action or proceeding he is prosecuting in his own behalf. In contradistinction with its predecessors, subdivision (d) of section 29 of the New York City Civil Court Act, and section 19 of the Municipal Court Code, both of which employed the word “must”, the language of subdivision (a) of section 401 of the CCA is permissive rather than mandatory. In the absénce of an inconsistent statute, therefore, CPLR 321 (subd. [a]) and CPLR 105 (subd. [c]) must be deemed applicable to the court below (CPLR 101). A plaintiff in person, therefore, included in the definition of 1 ‘ attorney ’ ’ (CPLR 105, subd. [c]) must have the right to issue a summons in his own action (see O’Brien v. Lashar, 206 App. Div. 623, affd. 236 N. Y. 602; Dorter v. De Mesa, 196 App. Div. 462).

The orders should be reversed, with $10 costs and original motion of plaintiff granted.

Concur — Tilzer, J. P., Hoestadter and Hecht, JJ.

Orders reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Misc. 2d 542, 257 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-blupal-realty-corp-nyappterm-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack