Ryan v. Barnwell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Ryan v. Barnwell

178 S.E. 345, 175 S.C. 73, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 72

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 5, 1935

Docket13992

StatusPublished

This text of 178 S.E. 345 (Ryan v. Barnwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryan v. Barnwell, 178 S.E. 345, 175 S.C. 73, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 72 (S.C. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. E. C. Dennis, Acting Associate Justice.

This is an action for the specific performance of an alleged verbal contract for the purchase of real estate.

Judge Johnson, in his decree states: “I have given careful consideration to the testimony and heard the arguments of counsel and have definitely reached the conclusion that no contract was ever made between plaintiff and the defendant trustee for the sale of the property in question.”

The evidence abundantly sustains this conclusion of the trial Judge.

Specific performance of a contract is not a matter of right in equity but rests in the sound discretion of the Court. Anthony v. Eve, 109 S. C., 255, 95 S. E., 513; Bull v. Fal low, 109 S. C., 306, 96 S. E., 147, and Jolly v. Martin, 120 S. C., 317, 113 S. E., 128.

Judgment affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Stabler, Carter and Bonham and Mr. Acting Associate Justice C. J. Ramage concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI