Ryan v. Accardi
This text of Ryan v. Accardi (Ryan v. Accardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
WALTER E. RYAN, JR. and RYAN § ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC on § No. 224, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others § Similarly Situated, § Court Below—Court of § Chancery of the State of Plaintiffs Below, § Delaware Appellants, § § C.A No. 2022-0255 v. § § TRACY ACCARDI, JAMES R. § BERGMAN, JOSEPH R. § BRONSON, TUNC DOLUCA, § ROBERT E. GRADY, MERCEDES § JOHNSON, WILLIAM P. § SULLIVAN, WILLIAM D. § WATKINS, MARYANN WRIGHT, § and ANALOG DEVICES, INC., § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. §
Submitted: February 14, 2024 Decided: February 26, 2024
Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
This 26th day of February 2024, after careful consideration of the parties’
briefs and the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the
judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the
reasons stated in its May 2, 2023 order and transcript ruling granting appellees’ motion to dismiss appellants’ complaint and its May 30, 2023 order denying
appellants’ motion for reargument.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of
Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ryan v. Accardi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-v-accardi-del-2024.