Ryan Stancu v. Southern Methodist University
This text of Ryan Stancu v. Southern Methodist University (Ryan Stancu v. Southern Methodist University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered August 17, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-00666-CV
RYAN STANCU, Appellant
V.
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY, Appellee
On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-14134
ORDER
Although the reporter’s record has not been filed, appellant has filed his
brief on the merits. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal be submitted without the
reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).
Appellant’s brief is deficient in that it fails to include: (1) a table of contents
with references to the pages of the brief; (2) an index of authorities arranged
alphabetically and indicating the pages of the brief where the authorities are cited;
(3) issues presented for review; (4) a statement of facts supported by record references; and (5) clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with
appropriate citations to the record. See id. 38.1(b), (c), (f), (g) & (i). Accordingly
appellant shall file an amended brief correcting the noted deficiencies within ten
days of the date of this order. Failure to file an amended brief will result in the
appeal being submitted with the deficient brief.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ryan Stancu v. Southern Methodist University, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-stancu-v-southern-methodist-university-texapp-2021.