Ryan McMahon v. John Whitney, et al.

Opinion

RYAN MCMAHON, Case No. 2:23-cv-1972-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOHN WHITNEY, et al., Defendants. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 31, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed October 31, 2025, are ADOPTED; 2. This action 1s dismissed for the reasons set forth in the court’s August 5, 2025 order, see ECF No. 96; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. DATED: December 8, 2026.

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE