Ryan McFadyen v. Linwood Wilson

585 F. App'x 135
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 4, 2014·No. 14-1499·Unpublished

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Linwood Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing two claims against him and denying his motion for sanctions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the order did not dispose of all claims against all parties, it is not a final order. See Robinson v. Parke-Davis & Co., 685 F.2d 912, 913 (4th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Nor is it an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan McFadyen v. Linwood Wilson, 585 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2014).

585 F. App'x 135 (Ryan McFadyen v. Linwood Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related