Ryan McFadyen v. Linwood Wilson

585 F. App'x 135
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 2014
Docket14-1499
StatusUnpublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 135 (Ryan McFadyen v. Linwood Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ryan McFadyen v. Linwood Wilson, 585 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Linwood Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing two claims against him and denying his motion for sanctions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the order did not dispose of all claims against all parties, it is not a final order. See Robinson v. Parke-Davis & Co., 685 F.2d 912, 913 (4th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Nor is it an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
585 F. App'x 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-mcfadyen-v-linwood-wilson-ca4-2014.