Ryan M.B. v. Mary R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ryan M.B. v. Mary R.

43 A.D.3d 1304, 841 N.Y.S.2d 905

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 43 A.D.3d 1304 (Ryan M.B. v. Mary R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryan M.B. v. Mary R., 43 A.D.3d 1304, 841 N.Y.S.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (David J. Roman, J), entered July 17, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted the motion of respondents and the Law Guardian to dismiss the amended petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order granting the motion of respondents and the Law Guardian to dismiss his amended petition seeking visitation with his child. Inasmuch as petitioner specified in the amended petition that he was seeking visitation with his child “during the time of his incarceration” and he was released from incarceration during the pendency of this appeal, the appeal is moot {see generally Matter of Demetrius B., 28 AD3d 1249, 1250 [2006], Iv denied 7 NY3d 707 [2006]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Gorski, Lunn, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (David J. Roman, J), entered July 17, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted the motion of respondents and the Law Guardian to dismiss the amended petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order granting the motion of respondents and the Law Guardian to dismiss his amended petition seeking visitation with his child. Inasmuch as petitioner specified in the amended petition that he was seeking visitation with his child “during the time of his incarceration” and he was released from incarceration during the pendency of this appeal, the appeal is moot {see generally Matter of Demetrius B., 28 AD3d 1249, 1250 [2006], Iv denied 7 NY3d 707 [2006]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Gorski, Lunn, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.3d 1304, 841 N.Y.S.2d 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-mb-v-mary-r-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack