Ryan Kelsall v. Rachel Haisten

Opinion

Opinion issued July 15, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Because no certificate of conference was included with the motion, the Court

held this motion for 10 days to permit the appellee to respond. No response was

filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(1). Accordingly, we grant the motion.

We dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Any pending motions

are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-24-00085-CV ——————————— RYAN KELSALL, Appellant V. RACHEL HAISTEN, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Waller County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 22-12-27249 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Ryan Kelsall has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, stating that the parties have resolved their underlying dispute and a new agreed order in the suit to modify the parent-child relationship has been signed by the trial court. Appellant attached a copy of the new order to the motion.