Ryan Kelsall v. Rachel Haisten

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 15, 2025
Docket01-24-00085-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ryan Kelsall v. Rachel Haisten (Ryan Kelsall v. Rachel Haisten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ryan Kelsall v. Rachel Haisten, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Opinion issued July 15, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00085-CV ——————————— RYAN KELSALL, Appellant V. RACHEL HAISTEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Waller County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 22-12-27249

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ryan Kelsall has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, stating that

the parties have resolved their underlying dispute and a new agreed order in the suit

to modify the parent-child relationship has been signed by the trial court. Appellant

attached a copy of the new order to the motion. Because no certificate of conference was included with the motion, the Court

held this motion for 10 days to permit the appellee to respond. No response was

filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(1). Accordingly, we grant the motion.

We dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Any pending motions

are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ryan Kelsall v. Rachel Haisten, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-kelsall-v-rachel-haisten-texapp-2025.