Ryan Kelsall v. Rachel Haisten

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-17-00389-CV Style: Ryan Kelsall v. Rachel Haisten Date motion filed*: February 6, 2018 Type of motion: Opposed Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee’ s Brief Party filing motion: Appellee’s counsel Denice Smith Document to be filed: Appellee’ s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: November 22, 2017 Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due Date: January 22, 2018 Date Requested: February 21, 2018 (91 days from original due date)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: February 21, 2018.  No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Because appellee’s counsel’s third extension provides extraordinary reasons for needing more time to file her brief, this extension is granted until February 21, 2018, but no further extensions will be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 38.6(d).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Date: February 13, 2018

November 7, 2008 Revision