Ryan Jackman v. Members Coop Credit Union
This text of Ryan Jackman v. Members Coop Credit Union (Ryan Jackman v. Members Coop Credit Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 21-3143 ___________________________
Ryan N. Jackman; Jessica K. Jackman
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants
v.
Members Cooperative Credit Union
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: July 27, 2022 Filed: August 1, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota residents Ryan and Jessica Jackman appeal the district court’s1 dismissal of their pro se complaint on res judicata grounds. Upon careful de novo
1 The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. review, see Smith v. Johnson, 779 F.3d 867, 870 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review), we conclude that the district court did not err in finding that the claims were barred by res judicata, see Ashanti v. City of Golden Valley, 666 F.3d 1148, 1151 (8th Cir. 2012) (law of forum that rendered first judgment controls res judicata analysis); Hauschildt v. Beckingham, 686 N.W.2d 829, 840 (Minn. 2004) (en banc) (elements of res judicata under Minnesota law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ryan Jackman v. Members Coop Credit Union, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-jackman-v-members-coop-credit-union-ca8-2022.