Ryan Jackman v. Members Coop Credit Union

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-3143

___________________________

Ryan N. Jackman; Jessica K. Jackman

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants

v.

Members Cooperative Credit Union

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________

Submitted: July 27, 2022 Filed: August 1, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota residents Ryan and Jessica Jackman appeal the district court’s1 dismissal of their pro se complaint on res judicata grounds. Upon careful de novo

1 The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

review, see Smith v. Johnson, 779 F.3d 867, 870 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review), we conclude that the district court did not err in finding that the claims were barred by res judicata, see Ashanti v. City of Golden Valley, 666 F.3d 1148, 1151 (8th Cir. 2012) (law of forum that rendered first judgment controls res judicata analysis); Hauschildt v. Beckingham, 686 N.W.2d 829, 840 (Minn. 2004) (en banc) (elements of res judicata under Minnesota law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________