Ryan Doyle v. State
This text of Ryan Doyle v. State (Ryan Doyle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
RYAN DOYLE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-1378
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 6, 2018
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, John Marshall Kest, Judge.
Ryan Doyle, South Bay, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.850 motion. We affirm
as to Grounds One, Three, Four and Five. However, we reverse as to Ground Two
because it was facially sufficient and the attached records do not conclusively refute
Appellant’s claim.
We remand for the postconviction court to reconsider Ground Two and either
conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach records conclusively refuting Appellant’s claim
set forth in Ground Two. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
TORPY, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ryan Doyle v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-doyle-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.