Ryan Dewayne Norris v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 5, 2018
Docket05-17-01237-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ryan Dewayne Norris v. State (Ryan Dewayne Norris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ryan Dewayne Norris v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Order entered October 5, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01237-CR

RYAN DEWAYNE NORRIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1400222-N

ORDER Appellant was convicted of tampering with physical evidence in May of 2014 and placed

on community supervision. The State later moved to revoke appellant’s community supervision.

In October 2017, the trial court granted the State’s motion, but used the wrong form in rendering

judgment. The judgment is on the form titled, “Judgment Adjudicating Guilt,” instead of on the

appropriate form titled, “Judgment Revoking Community Supervision.” See STANDARDIZED

FELONY JUDGMENT FORMS, http://www.txcourts.gov/rules-forms/forms/ (last visited October 2,

2018).

On August 29, 2018, we ordered the trial court to enter a corrected judgment revoking

community supervision and abated the appeal to allow the trial court to comply. On September 28, 2018, we received a supplemental clerk’s record containing a judgment nunc pro tunc. In that

document, the trial court ordered, “SAID JUDGMENT IN THE ABOVE NUMBERED CAUSE

IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ THAT JUDGMENT REVOKING COMMUNITY

SUPERVISION [sic].” This change does not correct what is wrong with the substance of the

October 2017 judgment, including the following:

 The judgment includes the inapplicable term “Plea to Motion to Adjudicate,” rather

than the term “Plea to Motion to Revoke.”

 It fails to include the “Original Punishment Assessed.”

 The judgment incorrectly states that the trial court previously made no finding of guilt

and rendered no judgment.

 The judgment does not reflect that appellant was previously convicted of the offense

and that his community supervision was revoked.

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the trial court to enter a corrected judgment using a

form appropriate for a judgment revoking community supervision. We ORDER the trial court to

transmit a supplemental clerk’s record containing the corrected judgment to this Court no later

than October 19, 2018. Time is of the essence. This appeal was submitted on October 3, 2018,

and cannot proceed with an incorrect judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4(a); see Felder v. State,

No. 03-00706-CR, 2014 WL 3560426, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin July 18, 2014, no pet.) (per

curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal shall be reinstated TWENTY DAYS from the date of this order or when we receive the

supplemental clerk’s record, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS PRESIDING JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ryan Dewayne Norris v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-dewayne-norris-v-state-texapp-2018.