Ryan Christopher Wickerham v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00747-CR

Ryan Christopher Wickerham, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 12-02207-1, THE HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ryan Christopher Wickerham has filed a pro se motion to dismiss this

appeal.1 We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 19, 2014

Do Not Publish

1 Appellant appeals, pro se, his conviction for family-violence assault. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.013. The record reflects that appellant chose to represent himself at trial and continues to do so on appeal, despite repeated admonishments from the trial court prior to trial and prior to this appeal of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation. See U.S. Const. amend. VI, XIV; Tex. Const. art. I, § 10; Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975).