Ryan-Bulkley-Hickey Corp. v. Steinbuch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ryan-Bulkley-Hickey Corp. v. Steinbuch

262 A.D. 884, 28 N.Y.S.2d 475

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 884 (Ryan-Bulkley-Hickey Corp. v. Steinbuch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryan-Bulkley-Hickey Corp. v. Steinbuch, 262 A.D. 884, 28 N.Y.S.2d 475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion plaintiff’s claim accrued in 1933, when the trustees settled plaintiff’s accounts and completely liquidated its assets. The action, having been commenced more than six years after plaintiff’s claim accrued, is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion plaintiff’s claim accrued in 1933, when the trustees settled plaintiff’s accounts and completely liquidated its assets. The action, having been commenced more than six years after plaintiff’s claim accrued, is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 884, 28 N.Y.S.2d 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-bulkley-hickey-corp-v-steinbuch-nyappdiv-1941.