Ryan-Bulkley-Hickey Corp. v. Steinbuch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ryan-Bulkley-Hickey Corp. v. Steinbuch

262 A.D. 884, 28 N.Y.S.2d 475

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 23, 1941·Published

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion plaintiff’s claim accrued in 1933, when the trustees settled plaintiff’s accounts and completely liquidated its assets. The action, having been commenced more than six years after plaintiff’s claim accrued, is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion plaintiff’s claim accrued in 1933, when the trustees settled plaintiff’s accounts and completely liquidated its assets. The action, having been commenced more than six years after plaintiff’s claim accrued, is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Ryan-Bulkley-Hickey Corp. v. Steinbuch, 262 A.D. 884, 28 N.Y.S.2d 475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 884 (Ryan-Bulkley-Hickey Corp. v. Steinbuch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.