Ryan Ashton Couture v. Hany Ahmed

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 21, 2021
Docket01-21-00488-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ryan Ashton Couture v. Hany Ahmed (Ryan Ashton Couture v. Hany Ahmed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ryan Ashton Couture v. Hany Ahmed, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Opinion issued December 21, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00488-CV ——————————— RYAN ASHTON COUTURE, Appellant V. HANY AHMED, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1165542

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ryan Ashton Couture, filed an appeal from a final judgment signed

on September 1, 2021. Appellant has not paid for the clerk’s record or the required

filing fee and has not established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 5, 20.1 (indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207,

51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court,

in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-

District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Appellant

failed to respond to our notices of October 4, 2021 (past due filing fee) and

November 2, 2021 (non-payment for the clerk’s record), that, should appellant not

pay the fee for the clerk’s record or the filing fee or establish indigence, this appeal

was subject to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule),

37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s

fault), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Appellant has not responded

to this Court’s notices.

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Countiss, and Guerra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ryan Ashton Couture v. Hany Ahmed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-ashton-couture-v-hany-ahmed-texapp-2021.