Ryan Anderson v. Jason Pollard

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 16, 2019·No. 19-1372·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1372

RYAN ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JASON W. POLLARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00686-REP)

Submitted: August 5, 2019 Decided: August 16, 2019

Before FLOYD, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryan Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ryan Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his in forma pauperis

complaint as frivolous, vexatious, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be

granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

the motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Anderson v. Pollard, No. 3:18-cv-00686-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2019). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan Anderson v. Jason Pollard, (4th Cir. 2019).

Ryan Anderson v. Jason Pollard (Ryan Anderson v. Jason Pollard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.