Ryals v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ryals v. New York City Transit Authority

104 A.D.3d 519, 960 N.Y.S.2d 316

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.3d 519 (Ryals v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryals v. New York City Transit Authority, 104 A.D.3d 519, 960 N.Y.S.2d 316 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from decision, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered March 12, 2012, which denied plaintiffs motion, pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a), seeking to set aside the verdict and a new trial on the issue of liability, and directed the parties to settle judgment on notice, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

The appeal is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision, or an appealed paper directing the settlement of a judgment (see CPLR 5512 [a]; Gunn v Palmieri, 86 NY2d 830 [1995]; Leser v Penido, 96 AD3d 578 [1st Dept 2012]). Moreover, plaintiffs right to a direct appeal from any order denying a motion to set aside the verdict terminated with the entry of a judgment (see CPLR 5501; Matter ofAho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). Concur— Andrias, J.E, Sweeny, Freedman, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from decision, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered March 12, 2012, which denied plaintiffs motion, pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a), seeking to set aside the verdict and a new trial on the issue of liability, and directed the parties to settle judgment on notice, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

The appeal is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision, or an appealed paper directing the settlement of a judgment (see CPLR 5512 [a]; Gunn v Palmieri, 86 NY2d 830 [1995]; Leser v Penido, 96 AD3d 578 [1st Dept 2012]). Moreover, plaintiffs right to a direct appeal from any order denying a motion to set aside the verdict terminated with the entry of a judgment (see CPLR 5501; Matter ofAho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). Concur— Andrias, J.E, Sweeny, Freedman, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.3d 519, 960 N.Y.S.2d 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryals-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack