Ryal's, Inc. v. Stavropoulos

263 N.W. 770, 273 Mich. 680, 1935 Mich. LEXIS 644
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 10, 1935
DocketDocket No. 19, Calendar No. 38,517.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 263 N.W. 770 (Ryal's, Inc. v. Stavropoulos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ryal's, Inc. v. Stavropoulos, 263 N.W. 770, 273 Mich. 680, 1935 Mich. LEXIS 644 (Mich. 1935).

Opinion

*681 Potter, C. J.

September 29, 1927, defendant leased the premises in dispute from Frank H. Miller for the term of five years from and after August 1, 1927, at a rental of $300 a month, payable in advance. This lease expired August 1,1932.

After the expiration of this lease, defendant continued to hold, use and occupy the premises, but paid a reduced rental therefor which was received and accepted by the landlord. Miller subsequently leased the premises to plaintiff.

Defendant, holding over after the expiration of his lease, became a tenant by sufferance, that is, a tenant who came into possession rightfully, by permission of the owner, and continued to occupy the premises after the expiration of his lease. 1 Coke on Littleton, p. 57b; 2 Blackstone Commentaries, p. 150.

Under the lease, the rental was payable by defendant'monthly in advance, and, under 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13492, all estates by sufferance may be terminated by a three months’ notice to quit; and “when the rent reserved in a lease is payable at periods of less than three months, the time of such notice shall be sufficient if it be equal to the interval between the times of payment. ’ ’

The notice of January 30, 1935, to defendant to quit and surrender the premises on or before March 1, 1935, was sufficient. The notice of March 15, 1935, to quit or pay the rent due was served after this suit was brought. Defendant paid no rent thereafter. No suit was brought to recover rent after this second notice. There was no election of remedies, waiver or estoppel.

We find no error in the judgment of the trial court which is affirmed, with costs.

Toy, North, Fead, Wiest, Butzel, Bushnell, and Edward M. Sharpe, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodson v. Nava Lopez
E.D. Michigan, 2023
Outfront Media LLC v. Cya Properties LLC
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2018
Mark Mills v. County of Lapeer
498 F. App'x 507 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Alan Louis Hunyady
409 F.3d 297 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Hunyady
Sixth Circuit, 2005
In Re MacOmb Occupational Health Care, LLC
300 B.R. 270 (E.D. Michigan, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 N.W. 770, 273 Mich. 680, 1935 Mich. LEXIS 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryals-inc-v-stavropoulos-mich-1935.