R.W.L. v. J.R.

Missouri Court of Appeals

R.W.L. v. J.R.

428 S.W.3d 661, 2013 WL 6858288, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1554

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 31, 2013·No. No. WD 76366·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

J.R. (Mother) appeals the trial court’s judgment appointing T.C. (Grandfather) and M.J.C. as co-guardians and eo-eonser-vators of Mother and C.L.’s (Father) three minor children (R.W.L., N.G.L., and B.L.L.). Mother claims that the trial court erred in finding that she is unable to care for the children and unfit to assume the duties of guardian and conservator in that the court’s findings were not supported by substantial evidence, were against the weight of the evidence, and misapplied the law. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

J.R. (Mother) appeals the trial court’s judgment appointing T.C. (Grandfather) and M.J.C. as co-guardians and eo-eonser-vators of Mother and C.L.’s (Father) three minor children (R.W.L., N.G.L., and B.L.L.). Mother claims that the trial court erred in finding that she is unable to care for the children and unfit to assume the duties of guardian and conservator in that the court’s findings were not supported by substantial evidence, were against the weight of the evidence, and misapplied the law. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

R.W.L. v. J.R., 428 S.W.3d 661, 2013 WL 6858288, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1554 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

428 S.W.3d 661 (R.W.L. v. J.R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.