Rweyemamu v. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities
916 A.2d 51, 281 Conn. 911
This text of 916 A.2d 51 (Rweyemamu v. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rweyemamu v. Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, 916 A.2d 51, 281 Conn. 911 (Colo. 2007).
Opinion
Justinian RWEYEMAMU
v.
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Harold H. Burbank II, Canton, in support of the petition.
Charles Krich and Meredith G. Diette, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn.App. 646, 911 A.2d 319 (2006), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rweyemamu v. Commission on Human Rights
911 A.2d 319 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
916 A.2d 51, 281 Conn. 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rweyemamu-v-commission-on-human-rights-and-opportunities-conn-2007.