R.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.W. v. State

591 So. 2d 1161, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 600, 1992 WL 12167

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 28, 1992

DocketNo. 91-272

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 591 So. 2d 1161 (R.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.W. v. State, 591 So. 2d 1161, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 600, 1992 WL 12167 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

R.W. appeals his adjudication of delinquency for possession of cocaine. At trial the court excluded a belatedly disclosed defense' witness without conducting the hearing required by Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). See also Smith v. State, 372 So.2d 86, 88 (Fla.1979); Wilkerson v. State, 461 So.2d 1376, 1379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The State has confessed error. The adjudication of delinquency is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

R.W. appeals his adjudication of delinquency for possession of cocaine. At trial the court excluded a belatedly disclosed defense' witness without conducting the hearing required by Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). See also Smith v. State, 372 So.2d 86, 88 (Fla.1979); Wilkerson v. State, 461 So.2d 1376, 1379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The State has confessed error. The adjudication of delinquency is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 So. 2d 1161, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 600, 1992 WL 12167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rw-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack