R.V. v. Dep't of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.V. v. Dep't of Children & Families

259 So. 3d 200

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 2018·No. No. 3D18-0734·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw pursuant to Jimenez v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 669 So.2d 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Further, upon consideration of the initial brief, and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). See Soro v. Soro, 145 So.3d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ; Fla. Detroit Diesel v. Nathai, 28 So.3d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ("[W]e conclude that the appellants' initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.").

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw pursuant to Jimenez v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 669 So.2d 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Further, upon consideration of the initial brief, and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). See Soro v. Soro, 145 So.3d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ; Fla. Detroit Diesel v. Nathai, 28 So.3d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ("[W]e conclude that the appellants' initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.").

Affirmed.

R.V. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 259 So. 3d 200 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

259 So. 3d 200 (R.V. v. Dep't of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related