R.V. v. Dep't of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.V. v. Dep't of Children & Families

259 So. 3d 200

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 17, 2018

DocketNo. 3D18-0734

StatusPublished

This text of 259 So. 3d 200 (R.V. v. Dep't of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R.V. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 259 So. 3d 200 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw pursuant to Jimenez v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 669 So.2d 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Further, upon consideration of the initial brief, and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). See Soro v. Soro, 145 So.3d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ; Fla. Detroit Diesel v. Nathai, 28 So.3d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ("[W]e conclude that the appellants' initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.").

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw pursuant to Jimenez v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 669 So.2d 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Further, upon consideration of the initial brief, and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). See Soro v. Soro, 145 So.3d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ; Fla. Detroit Diesel v. Nathai, 28 So.3d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ("[W]e conclude that the appellants' initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal and we therefore summarily affirm the order without the need for an answer brief.").

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 So. 3d 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rv-v-dept-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack