Rutty v. Person

18 Jones & S. 528
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMarch 3, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Jones & S. 528 (Rutty v. Person) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rutty v. Person, 18 Jones & S. 528 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation in which the defendants stipulate, among other things, to produce their books before the referee, and the plaintiff siipulates not to enforce any order requiring the defendants to produce their books. This stipulation renders an order for the production and inspection of the books unnecessary, at least until it is shown that the defendants have refused to comply with l;he terms of their stipulation. When they shall be produced before the referee, they will be under his control, and he may then make such order concerning them a.s he deems just. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to be taxed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Jones & S. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutty-v-person-nysuperctnyc-1884.