Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Ruttle v. Toffel

Ruttle v. Toffel

805 So. 2d 689, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 189, 2001 WL 586903
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 1, 2001
Docket1991635
StatusPublished

This text of 805 So. 2d 689 (Ruttle v. Toffel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruttle v. Toffel, 805 So. 2d 689, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 189, 2001 WL 586903 (Ala. 2001).

Opinions

WOODALL, Justice.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(E), Ala. R.App. P.; § 6-5-574(a), Ala.Code 1975; and Michael v. Beasley, 583 So.2d 245 (Ala.1991).

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, BROWN, and HARWOOD, JJ., concur. LYONS, JOHNSTONE, and STUART, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael v. Beasley
583 So. 2d 245 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
805 So. 2d 689, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 189, 2001 WL 586903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruttle-v-toffel-ala-2001.