Rutter v. Julien J. Studley, Inc.

244 A.D.2d 239, 664 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11713
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered June 28, 1996, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by arbitration and award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs various causes of action are all impermissible collateral attacks on the intracompany arbitration and award of his dispute with his co-employee and partner, concerning which he agreed in writing to be bound and did not bring a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 (a) to vacate. No issues of facts exist as to whether plaintiffs employment was other than one at will (see, Wieder v Skala, 80 NY2d 628, 633), in the context of [240]*240which defendant employer had the right to impose any terms it chose on plaintiffs continued employment (see, General Elec. Tech. Servs. Co. v Clinton, 173 AD2d 86, 88, lv denied 79 NY2d 759), including plaintiffs agreement to be bound by the results of the arbitration. We have considered plaintiffs "other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rutter v. Julien J. Studley, Inc., 244 A.D.2d 239, 664 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 239 (Rutter v. Julien J. Studley, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clarke-St. John v. City of New York
2018 NY Slip Op 5819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Berger v. Roosevelt Investment Group Inc.
28 A.D.3d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)