Rutter v. Janis
185 A.3d 594, 329 Conn. 904
Opinion
The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court,
"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude, under the circumstances of this case, that the thirty day loan period of General Statutes § 14-60 did not, as a matter of law, include the first day of the loan period?"
KAHN and ECKER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rutter v. Janis, 185 A.3d 594, 329 Conn. 904 (Colo. 2018).
185 A.3d 594 (Rutter v. Janis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rutter v. Janis
334 Conn. 722 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2020)