Rutter v. Germicide Co.
24 N.Y.S. 215, 70 Hun 403, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 8
Opinion
In view of the conduct of the defendant in reference to the production of the books under the subpoena duces tecum, we think the granting of the order for examination was justified. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rutter v. Germicide Co., 24 N.Y.S. 215, 70 Hun 403, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 8 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
24 N.Y.S. 215 (Rutter v. Germicide Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McGeary v. Brown
122 N.W. 605 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1909)