Rutt v. Jungle Larry's Safari Land, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rutt v. Jungle Larry's Safari Land, Inc.

718 So. 2d 920, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12347, 1998 WL 667605

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 30, 1998

DocketNo. 97-05369

StatusPublished

This text of 718 So. 2d 920 (Rutt v. Jungle Larry's Safari Land, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rutt v. Jungle Larry's Safari Land, Inc., 718 So. 2d 920, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12347, 1998 WL 667605 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rosine Rutt appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the appeals referee’s determination that her employer fired her for misconduct connected with work, as defined in section 443.036(26), Florida Statutes (1997), and that she was therefore disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal to this court, the commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. We affirm because we find no legal error, and the record contains competent, substantial evidence to support the appeals referee’s conclusion that Rutt’s employer discharged her for misconduct sufficient to justify denial of unemployment benefits. See Quinn v. Payroll Transfers Florida, Inc., 709 So.2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

PARKER, C.J., and FRANK and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rosine Rutt appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the appeals referee’s determination that her employer fired her for misconduct connected with work, as defined in section 443.036(26), Florida Statutes (1997), and that she was therefore disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal to this court, the commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. We affirm because we find no legal error, and the record contains competent, substantial evidence to support the appeals referee’s conclusion that Rutt’s employer discharged her for misconduct sufficient to justify denial of unemployment benefits. See Quinn v. Payroll Transfers Florida, Inc., 709 So.2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

PARKER, C.J., and FRANK and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

718 So. 2d 920, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12347, 1998 WL 667605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutt-v-jungle-larrys-safari-land-inc-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack