Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rutnam v. Syracuse University

Rutnam v. Syracuse University

50 A.D.3d 1575, 855 N.Y.S.2d 393
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 25, 2008
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.3d 1575 (Rutnam v. Syracuse University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rutnam v. Syracuse University, 50 A.D.3d 1575, 855 N.Y.S.2d 393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Thomas J. Murphy, J.), entered December 13, 2006. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendants The Syracuse University, also known as Syracuse University, Syracuse University Health Services and Syracuse University Counseling Center for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint against them.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Smith, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.3d 1575, 855 N.Y.S.2d 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutnam-v-syracuse-university-nyappdiv-2008.