Rutledge v. State

98 S.W.2d 809
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 18, 1936
DocketNo. 18587
StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.W.2d 809 (Rutledge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rutledge v. State, 98 S.W.2d 809 (Tex. 1936).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry territory; penalty assessed at a fine of $100.

The information appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

No error has been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.W.2d 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutledge-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.