Rutledge v. State

266 S.W. 1117, 98 Tex. Crim. 403, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 667
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rutledge v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Tex. Crim. 231
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 26, 1924·No. No. 8515.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Lavaca County of an aggravated assault, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $225.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. There appears in the record what purports to be appellant’s objections to the charge of the court, but the fact that same were presented to the learned trial judge for his action is not evidenced by any bill 6f exceptions or notation on the purported objections. The indictment is sufficient and the charge submits the law.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rutledge v. State, 266 S.W. 1117, 98 Tex. Crim. 403, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 667 (Tex. 1924).

266 S.W. 1117 (Rutledge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.