Rutledge v. Peake
313 F. App'x 312
This text of 313 F. App'x 312 (Rutledge v. Peake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rutledge v. Peake, 313 F. App'x 312 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of Bennie Rutledge’s failure to respond to the court’s March 19, 2008 order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
(3) All pending motions are moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
313 F. App'x 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutledge-v-peake-cafc-2008.