Rutledge v. Peake
313 F. App'x 312
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of Bennie Rutledge’s failure to respond to the court’s March 19, 2008 order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
(3) All pending motions are moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rutledge v. Peake, 313 F. App'x 312 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
313 F. App'x 312 (Rutledge v. Peake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.