Rutledge v. . Fitzgerald
This text of 147 S.E. 816 (Rutledge v. . Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant did not request the court below to find the facts upon which the rulings of the court below were based. In the absence of such finding, it is presumed that the court below, upon proper evidence, found facts sufficient to support the judgment. The whole matter is fully discussed and decisions cited in Holcomb v. Holcomb, 192 N. C., 504; Helderman v. Mills Co., 192 N. C., 626. See Lumber Co. v. Anderson, 196 N. C., 474; Realty Corp. v. Fisher, 196 N. C., 503; Coach Co. v. Griffin, 196 N. C., 559. The judgment of the court below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 S.E. 816, 197 N.C. 163, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutledge-v-fitzgerald-nc-1929.