Rutledge v. City of Norfolk
This text of 334 F. App'x 567 (Rutledge v. City of Norfolk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaint for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be gmnted. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appel- [568]*568lant’s Brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and Rutledge’s brief alleges no error committed by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 F. App'x 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutledge-v-city-of-norfolk-ca4-2009.