Rutledge v. City of Norfolk

Fourth Circuit

Rutledge v. City of Norfolk

334 F. App'x 567

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2009·No. No. 09-1510·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaint for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be gmnted. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appel- [568]*568lant’s Brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and Rutledge’s brief alleges no error committed by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaint for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be gmnted. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appel- [568]*568lant’s Brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and Rutledge’s brief alleges no error committed by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rutledge v. City of Norfolk, 334 F. App'x 567 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

334 F. App'x 567 (Rutledge v. City of Norfolk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related