Rutledge v. City of Danville

Fourth Circuit

Rutledge v. City of Danville

567 F. App'x 182

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2014·No. No. 13-2494·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court’s order imposing a pre-filing injunction and the court’s opinion dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Rutledge leave to proceed on appeal in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rutledge v. City of Danville, No. 4:13-cv-00066-JLK, 2013 [183] WL 6804697 (W.D.Va. Dec. 9 & Dec. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court’s order imposing a pre-filing injunction and the court’s opinion dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Rutledge leave to proceed on appeal in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rutledge v. City of Danville, No. 4:13-cv-00066-JLK, 2013 [183] WL 6804697 (W.D.Va. Dec. 9 & Dec. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rutledge v. City of Danville, 567 F. App'x 182 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

567 F. App'x 182 (Rutledge v. City of Danville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.