Rutland v. Rutland

7 So. 2d 553, 192 Miss. 613, 1942 Miss. LEXIS 64
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 13, 1942
DocketNo. 34944.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 So. 2d 553 (Rutland v. Rutland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rutland v. Rutland, 7 So. 2d 553, 192 Miss. 613, 1942 Miss. LEXIS 64 (Mich. 1942).

Opinion

*615 Alexander, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant was complainant in the trial court. She filed what was denominated a “Petition for Temporary Alimony” setting up that she was without means for support and that “this is an urgent and necessitous case for temporary alimony.” In said petition complainant prayed for general relief and that the defendant be required “to show cause, if any he can, why a reasonable amount should not be adjudged to he paid by the defendant for the support and maintenance of your petitioner. ’ ’

Demurrer was sustained on the ground that a decree for temporary alimony and solicitors’ fees cannot he entered save where complainant seeks either a divorce or. separate maintenance. While such is the general rule, the demurrer should not have been sustained since it is evident that the petition, while inartificially drawn, is susceptible of construction and acceptance as a bill for separate maintenance. We are of the opinion that the learned chancellor should have treated and heard it as such upon the merits of its allegations. Code 1930', see. 1420.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lynch v. Lynch
32 So. 2d 358 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 So. 2d 553, 192 Miss. 613, 1942 Miss. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutland-v-rutland-miss-1942.