Rutland v. Hill
This text of 91 S.E. 922 (Rutland v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where an attachment has been dissolved by the giving of a replevy bond, and on the trial a judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of his claim, it is lawful for the plaintiff to take judgment against the surety upon the replevy bond. Civil Code, of 1910, § 5113; Watters v. Southern Fixture &c. Co., 13 Ga. App. 468 (79 S. E. 360).
•2. The court is bound by the answer of a justice of the peace to the petition for certiorari, where the answer is neither traversed nor excepted to as provided by law.
3. The court did not err in not sustaining the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 922, 19 Ga. App. 528, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutland-v-hill-gactapp-1917.