Rutland v. Hill

91 S.E. 922, 19 Ga. App. 528, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 220
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 20, 1917
Docket7882
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 922 (Rutland v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rutland v. Hill, 91 S.E. 922, 19 Ga. App. 528, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 220 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Ltjke, J.

1. Where an attachment has been dissolved by the giving of a replevy bond, and on the trial a judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of his claim, it is lawful for the plaintiff to take judgment against the surety upon the replevy bond. Civil Code, of 1910, § 5113; Watters v. Southern Fixture &c. Co., 13 Ga. App. 468 (79 S. E. 360).

•2. The court is bound by the answer of a justice of the peace to the petition for certiorari, where the answer is neither traversed nor excepted to as provided by law.

3. The court did not err in not sustaining the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
68 S.E.2d 719 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Blakely Milling & Trading Co. v. Thompson
128 S.E. 688 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 922, 19 Ga. App. 528, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutland-v-hill-gactapp-1917.