Rutigliano v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rutigliano v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

155 A.D.2d 360

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 155 A.D.2d 360 (Rutigliano v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rutigliano v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, 155 A.D.2d 360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered November 21, 1988, denying the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the denial of his requests for reinstatement to the longshoremen’s register under the immediate reinstatement procedure, after a hiatus of nearly six years, was irrational, arbitrary or capricious. Concur — Ross, J. P., Asch, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.), entered November 21, 1988, denying the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the denial of his requests for reinstatement to the longshoremen’s register under the immediate reinstatement procedure, after a hiatus of nearly six years, was irrational, arbitrary or capricious. Concur — Ross, J. P., Asch, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 A.D.2d 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutigliano-v-waterfront-commission-of-new-york-harbor-nyappdiv-1989.