Rutherfurd Realty Company v. . Cook

84 N.E. 287, 191 N.Y. 555, 29 Bedell 555, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 1190
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 1908·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The findings of fact in the decision of the court have been unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.

Such findings do not show that the personal obligation of the defendant Cook was assigned to the plaintiff. The other questions discussed are not raised by such findings. The judgment should be reversed and'a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless the plaintiff within twenty days consents to amend the judgment, by striking therefrom that part thereof directing that if the proceeds of the sale of *556 the real property therein described be insufficient to pay the amount due to the plaintiff, with interest and costs, that the defendant Cook pay the same to the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff have execution therefor, in which case the judgment as so amended is affirmed, without costs to either party in this court.

Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoooic and Chase, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rutherfurd Realty Company v. . Cook, 84 N.E. 287, 191 N.Y. 555, 29 Bedell 555, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 1190 (N.Y. 1908).

84 N.E. 287 (Rutherfurd Realty Company v. . Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rutherfurd Realty Co. v. . Cook
90 N.E. 1112 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)
Rutherfurd Realty Co. v. Cook
130 A.D. 76 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)