Rutherford v. State

Texas Commission of Appeals

Rutherford v. State

290 S.W. 534

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 19, 1927

DocketNo. 10579

StatusPublished

This text of 290 S.W. 534 (Rutherford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rutherford v. State, 290 S.W. 534 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

The offense is swindling by giving, with intent to' defraud, a check without funds, and without reason to expect the check to be paid; punishment fixed at a fine of $50, and confinement in the county jail for a period of ten days.

The information is drawn in accord with subdivision 4, art. 1546, P. C. 1925. The complaint and information are deemed sufficient to charge the offense. No statement of the facts is before this court, in the absence of which whether the complaints of the refusal of the requested charges are meritorious or not cannot be ascertained.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, P. J.

The offense is swindling by giving, with intent to' defraud, a check without funds, and without reason to expect the check to be paid; punishment fixed at a fine of $50, and confinement in the county jail for a period of ten days.

The information is drawn in accord with subdivision 4, art. 1546, P. C. 1925. The complaint and information are deemed sufficient to charge the offense. No statement of the facts is before this court, in the absence of which whether the complaints of the refusal of the requested charges are meritorious or not cannot be ascertained.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 S.W. 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutherford-v-state-texcommnapp-1927.