Rutherford v. State

760 So. 2d 238, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6042, 2000 WL 640928
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rutherford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 820 So. 2d 407
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 2000·No. No. 2D99-4727·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to file a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). See State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999).

BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rutherford v. State, 760 So. 2d 238, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6042, 2000 WL 640928 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

760 So. 2d 238 (Rutherford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thompson
750 So. 2d 643 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)