Rutherford v. State Bank

3 Ark. 493
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 15, 1841·Published

Opinion

The Court,

the Chief Justice dissenting, held that the writ properly issued, a Judge having power to issue the same.

And afterwards, the motion to quash being renewed, and the want of fifteen days between the teste and return day assigned as a ground, by leave of the Court, the objection was held fatal, and the writ quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rutherford v. State Bank, 3 Ark. 493 (Ark. 1841).

3 Ark. 493 (Rutherford v. State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.