Rutherford v. Ohio Finance Co.

69 Ohio Law. Abs. 417, 1954 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 327
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division·Decided October 25, 1954·No. No. 190000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

By BARTLETT, J.

MOTION TO STRIKE AMENDED PETITION FROM FILES OVERRULED.

Before answer filed, plaintiff may amend petition without leave. Sec. 2309.55 R. C., upon notice to counsel, which was done in the instant case.

Counsel for defendant complains previous order of court not journalized. Under Rule VIII of this court, it was his duty to prepare the proper entry which he neglected to do. In any event plaintiff had a statutory right to file her amended petition, without the entry being filed.

Counsel complains that plaintiff sets out time lost while he requested amount lost. Counsel cannot control pleadings by his mere request.

“Loss of time and consequent loss of earnings,—are proper elements of damages for the consideration of the jury in personal injury actions.” 13 O. Jur. Damages, Sec. 47, p. 121.

[418] Loss of time as result of injury in many jurisdictions need not be pleaded, in others, including Ohio, must be specially pleaded—15 Am. Jur. Damages, Sec. 315, p. 757. The item “loss of time” must be pleaded,—the consequent loss of earnings and their amount, is evidential.

Entry accordingly with exceptions by counsel for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rutherford v. Ohio Finance Co., 69 Ohio Law. Abs. 417, 1954 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 327 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1954).

69 Ohio Law. Abs. 417 (Rutherford v. Ohio Finance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Gen. Motors LLC
339 F. Supp. 3d 262 (S.D. Illinois, 2018)