Rutherford v. Fisher

4 U.S. 22, 1 L. Ed. 724, 4 Dall. 22, 1800 U.S. LEXIS 302
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 18, 1800·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

4 U.S. 22 (____)
4 Dall. 22

Rutherford et al. Plaintiffs in Error,
versus
Fisher et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

CHASE, Justice.

In England a writ of error may be brought upon an interlocutory decree or order; and until a decision is obtained upon the writ, the proceedings in the Court below are stayed. But here the words of the act, which allow a writ of error, allow it only in the case of a final judgment.

By the COURT:

The writ must be quashed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rutherford v. Fisher, 4 U.S. 22, 1 L. Ed. 724, 4 Dall. 22, 1800 U.S. LEXIS 302 (1800).

4 U.S. 22 (Rutherford v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger
348 U.S. 176 (Supreme Court, 1955)
Sorensen v. United States
160 F.2d 938 (Second Circuit, 1947)
Southern Railway Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
179 U.S. 641 (Supreme Court, 1901)
Southern Ry. Co. v. Postal Tel. Cable Co.
93 F. 393 (Fourth Circuit, 1899)
Luxton v. North River Bridge Co.
147 U.S. 337 (Supreme Court, 1893)