Rutherford Hospital v. Florence Mills
This text of 122 S.E. 927 (Rutherford Hospital v. Florence Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant relies chiefly upon its demurrer to tbe evidence and motion for judgment as of nonsuit. Viewing tbe testimony in tbe most favorable light for tbe plaintiff, tbe accepted position on a motion of this kind, we think tbe trial court was justified in submitting tbe case to tbe jury, and that tbe verdict is warranted by tbe evidence. A careful perusal of tbe entire record leaves us with tbe impression that tbe cause has been tried substantially in agreement with tbe law bearing on tbe subject, and that tbe verdict and judgment should be upheld. Miller v. Cornell, ante, 550.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 S.E. 927, 187 N.C. 859, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutherford-hospital-v-florence-mills-nc-1924.